Kimbere
Well-known member
You completely missed/ignored the entire point of my post. Secondly, that’s a bad analogy for several reasons.I am doing an activity in my free time that I enjoy, say walking the dog through the park for example.
The local city/county/township that manages the park using my tax dollars that I pay, has set up a hot dog stand giving out free hot dogs.
I get one as I enjoy my day, but it is not the best hot dog ever. Infact the one I got on a particular day was less than.
I am not going to go home and make a post on the local forum whining that the free hot dog was less than what I hoped for.
And again, I don't understand why some people would do that.
But you do you.
Sorry you are disappointed with your weener.
1) Of course people who are serious about getting the issue addressed aren’t going to a random online forum to complain about the bad hotdog. That’s a non-sensical argument. Reasonable people would either address the issue directly with the vendor at the time they received it or contact the management/owners via whatever official communication channels are available - you know, kind of like someone posting a complaint about DDO on DDO’s official forums.
2) The hot dog wasn’t “free”. You and the other tax payers paid for it. If your tax dollars are funding it, you have the right to and should expect a good hotdog. If it's not good, you should be annoyed that your tax dollars are being wasted on something bad. Also, as I pointed out previously, daily die rolls are not necessarily free.
3). This is the most impotant part and also what you fail to understand. Your analogy does not contain an RNG based lottery style, tiered reward system. That system is what sets the expectation that the rarest, top tier prizes are measurably better than the lower tiers. I’m fairly sure nobody in their right mind expects a free park hotdog to be the best hotdog they’ve ever had. However, people who match 4 numbers on the Powerball lotto ticket do (and rightfully so) expect that to pay out more than a ticket that only matches 2 numbers.
To use your analogy properly, let’s say the “free” park hotdog was advertised as being the best footlong chili dog ever. Let’s also assume the stand used a spin-the-wheel-for-your-prize system. You spin the wheel and land on the smallest, hardest to hit slot - the “Best Footlong Chili Dog Ever”. The vendor congratulates you, then hands you what is clearly a microwaved 2-inch pig-in-blanket from the freezer section of the local grocery store. No chili, no onions, no cheese, no condiments. Nothing but a plain, low-quality appetizer.
You’re telling us that you wouldn’t be disappointed with receiving the crappy pig-in-a-blanket after they set the expectation you would get a delicious footlong chili dog? You think it’s unreasonable to question the vendor about the discrepancy between the expectation they set for your prize versus what you actually received?
Last edited: