ok, you all have pointed out some interesting stuff, I'd like to point out the following:
@Dom &
@Ying seems to be our leaders in the ratio score & in my personal opinion, they tend to deliver a s-ton of value. (honorable mention to-
@Cordovan who has a unique advantage)
it'd be easy to create tiers in a logarithmic fashion, like:
0-.2 = Starting
.3-.6 = Progressing
.7-1.1 = Average
1.2-1.7 = Leading
1.8-2.4 = Winner
2.5+ = Legend
or some such, the idea being that the exact number is not so relevant as the grouping, which can be valuable to folks who don't know others by names. (how many ppl don't know Dom/Ying, could their experience & knowledge be noted for all to consider, would a noob challenge a legend with inflammatory comments or challenge the legend with curiosity)
plus it's kind of a mini-game and would promote kindness (IMO).
while negative reactions do factor in, I believe folks are less likely to give a negative reaction, which is good b/c it means we as a community would prefer to support then detract others.
anyway, I can sense there's no appetite for change. thanks for chatting with me/us