Fisto Mk I
Well-known member
The best troll of the forum should explain that he is a troll? We are DOOMED!!!It's a troll. Was I too subtle?
The best troll of the forum should explain that he is a troll? We are DOOMED!!!It's a troll. Was I too subtle?
It didn't say max of 70. It said 65-70 which was an estimate of the best times. Many were 90+. Yes, I should have expressed the original post more succinctly. Lesson learned.The original said minimum 65, maximum 70, average 80, which did not make sense.
Don't worry about it. People like to troll. I had a similar reaction as others at first, but I gave you just a little credit and then realized that you were likely providing a rough estimate of best time and then average. Wasn't that hard to figure out...It didn't say max of 70. It said 65-70 which was an estimate of the best times. Many were 90+. Yes, I should have expressed the original post more succinctly. Lesson learned.
If you can fit the master of air feat, lightning bolt does more damage than chainlightning and polar ray on a 2 second cooldown.Rotation is literally just repeated:
[Thunderstroke, Chain Lightning, Iceberg, Polar Ray, Greater Shout, Shout]
(6 second cooldowns + global cooldown means it's pretty brainless). Possible optimisation in an order change so I can use Shout twice and remove Polar Ray but haven't tested - I do like how the current one meshes with Primal Avatar Mantle triggers so eh.
Great suggestion and very tempting.If you can fit the master of air feat, lightning bolt does more damage than chainlightning and polar ray on a 2 second cooldown.
The R7+ penalty is easy to account for in any comparison for these numbers.Only problem I can see with this test is that is conducted in normal/hard/elite circumstances, so no R7 caster nerf. So in means of DPS comparison in that kind of environment is useless. On the other hand even in this situation it shows disbalance in DPS melee/ranged/caster, which was said many times before - casters/nukers simply dont cut the mustard in current state of the game.
Sry don't get ur point. Briefly scan of numbers shows that melee even on non-reaper environment tears down Y in 20-ish secs, on other hand best case scenario for caster is 60+ sec (and they supposed to be NUKERS!), so even there ull see that not scaling spell force over lvl20 hurts a lot, after all were speaking on lvl34 environment. Post u made just to post and play wiseass and smart not needed., seriously, it's not constructive, I believe OP posted whole thread to show us (we know that, anyone who play caster knows anyways) and SSG (not that they care) that current state of game simply sux if u playing casters.The R7+ penalty is easy to account for in any comparison for these numbers.
What?Sry don't get ur point. Briefly scan of numbers shows that melee even on non-reaper environment tears down Y in 20-ish secs, on other hand best case scenario for caster is 60+ sec (and they supposed to be NUKERS!), so even there ull see that not scaling spell force over lvl20 hurts a lot, after all were speaking on lvl34 environment. Post u made just to post and play wiseass and smart not needed., seriously, it's not constructive, I believe OP posted whole thread to show us (we know that, anyone who play caster knows anyways) and SSG (not that they care) that current state of game simply sux if u playing casters.
Then accept my apologyWhat?
All I am saying is that it is very simple to add the penalty to the non-reaper numbers to get what the numbers would have been in reaper 7+ and thus get a fair comparison.
This was in response to the claim that tests were useless because they were done outside of reaper.
It was not in any way a defense of the current state of the game. In fact I advocate strongly for melee nerfs all the time.
What?
All I am saying is that it is very simple to add the penalty to the non-reaper numbers to get what the numbers would have been in reaper 7+ and thus get a fair comparison.
This was in response to the claim that tests were useless because they were done outside of reaper.
It was not in any way a defense of the current state of the game. In fact I advocate strongly for melee nerfs all the time.
Is that the most optimized damage Inquisitive? legit asking.I was back at cap on Inquisitive and tried it. I am listing the build below; it is not 100% optimized on gear. I am using an older attuned bone light repeater instead of Undying Age. I am sure there are some other improvements that I could get with mythic/reaper/curse bonus, etc..
This is a fun alternative to the FVS 17/3, you run super fast, I had 30d6 sneak and 21 imbue dice, with solid other numbers.
(with epic moment) Lamordia Experiment: ~16s
I honestly don't know, for sure, the gear could be better with undying age crossbow. I think it is a solid, inquisitive alternative. I did it for the run speed, which was awesome with barbarian + rogue + tabaxi; I think I was at 184% run speed.Is that the most optimized damage Inquisitive? legit asking.
By my calculations the 14/4/2 paladin version comes out slightly ahead on dps, but rogue is close enough not to worry about. The main differences are rogue utility/speed vs higher defences.Is that the most optimized damage Inquisitive? legit asking.
What Gear, Feats and multi Epic Destinies where you using to hit those numbers?I'd like to see a real-world example of the single-target DPS (melee vs caster) disparity that everyone is yelling about. Here's the test:
1) Go to the Lamordia warehouse (solo so HP is consistent) where Experiment Y lives.
2) Buff, etc. and note the starting time upon your first attack.
3) When Experiment Y is dead, mark the time completed in seconds
4) Reply to this post with your level, class split, and time.
The results assume a relatively lag-free experience and yes, this is just one specific monster type.
I mainly run casters so I'd be curious what well-geared melees can do. My own results on two caster classes are similar:
Level 34 Fire Sorc: 65-70 seconds with an average of about 80 seconds.
Level 34 Druid: 65-70 seconds with an average of about 80 seconds
So a Swash / EK build ?I have a 10/4/x Wizard/Bard/Experiment X class I'm looking to field, to test some things.
Yes, this is just a simple, generalized test. For those that want more, look elsewhere.
confused. you want specifics or general info?I'm curious since I haven't played a chaosmancer, but I've played a Stormsinger. Did the chaosmancer portion give you better DPS or was it all stormsinger abilities, debuffs, vulnerability, etc.?