The Predispose fallacy also known as the slippery slope fallacy occurs when an argument, or poll, assumes that a particular action, such as the expansion released, will inevitably lead to a series of undesireable consequences like the expansion being bad, often without providing sufficient evidence to support this claim.
This can lead to polls where most of the options predispose that the expansion was bad and leave little option for people to show the real reasons they purchased, or did not purchase, the expansion.
In this example we see how the only real 'Yes' answer acts as if because the buyer has already purchased the expansion it is too late to refund.
The no examples obviously support the predisposed position that the expansion is bad. All 3 of the Yes choices are negative and assume the purchase was a mistake, as do the no answers. Any answer you choose assumed the expansion is bad. This is not scientific and it not a useful poll.
Yes, I already purchased Myth Drannor. (too late to refund)
- No, but I will be buying after the raid comes out. (worth it only after the raid)
- No, but I will eventually be buying for DDO points. (only worth it as a discount)
- No, I will not be buying Myth Drannor. (bad)
- Yes, but I regret my purchase. (bad)
- Yes, but I wish had a purchased a lower tier. (bad)
To be (legit) the poll would need equivalent options such as:
* Yes, and I wish I got a higher tier
* Yes, and I am glad I can gear up before the raid
*Yes, and it was worth the price
etc
but, to be fair, all polling is fairly useless on the internet.