Separate the Falconry Trees please

Smokewolf

An Excited Member
  • Wis-to-hit in one tree, second tree for Wis-to-damage.
  • Sprint boost in one, Conditioning in the other.
  • Wis trance in one, helpless damage in the other.
I'm not quite there but I'm starting to believe!
So what's wrong with the current Falcony tree that requires the Dev's to so urgently rewrite it into two trees?
 

SpartanKiller13

Why do I have 522 ddo build files
So what's wrong with the current Falcony tree that requires the Dev's to so urgently rewrite it into two trees?
I mean I don't think it's a good idea, and hypothetical splits sorta just leave you with half a tree lol.

Like some trees *could* be split, particularly melee/ranged trees, but I'm generally in favor of combining similar trees (why are there 4 Savant trees instead of one with multiselectors?).
 

PersonMan

Well-known member
(why are there 4 Savant trees instead of one with multiselectors?).
I am against fusing the 4 savants into 1. 2 would be fine as one could skill 2 not opposite elements like Fire & Electric, Cold & Acid.
When they were designed there were no universal trees and no immunity stripping so building a secondary was fairly essential. While I am also against combining them, it is at least thinkable in modern DDO.
 

Buddha5440

"There are some who call me...Tim"
oh oh the new thing. That means it is currently overpowered but at some random point in time it will be nerfed from orbit?
INCOMING!!!

giphy.gif
 
Top