Necrodancer
Ancient beyond measure
Or do the wrong thing. It's their own messed up version of monkey paw.Dev's are not going to do anything abought this.
Or do the wrong thing. It's their own messed up version of monkey paw.Dev's are not going to do anything abought this.
Oh hell nah. No fail Spell pen requirements are already unattainable. Making it worse won't help. High DC's are useless if your spell pen isn't breaking through.If CC and instakills are seen as a problem give mobs deathblock, increase SR.
No-fail spell pen is certainly attainable... When I was at cap on my Wizard, I did not really invest in spell pen much and it was basically no-fail against everything, with some MD drow and a couple enemies in Lamordia where I would fail on like a 2.Oh hell nah. No fail Spell pen requirements are already unattainable. Making it worse won't help. High DC's are useless if your spell pen isn't breaking through.
not everyone has the benefit of being a single class wizard using magus. my sorc ek using draconic can barely get 45. r10s need 60-70 for no fail. i suspect that will increase soon.No-fail spell pen is certainly attainable... When I was at cap on my Wizard, I did not really invest in spell pen much and it was basically no-fail against everything, with some MD drow and a couple enemies in Lamordia where I would fail on like a 2.
This is what I had:
27 CL
9 equipment bonus
9 Wiz + FvS past lives
5 Pale master cores
3 Feydark
10 Magus
For 63 total. This was enough for any content.
Here are some other sources of spell pen:
+10 artifact
+1 equipment (from a +10 item)
+5 insightful item
+3 quality item
+3 legendary item
+2 arcane augmentation item
+3 eclipse power EPL
+3 arcanum racial enhancement
+10 dark bargainer vampire lord enhancement
+5 fatesinger
+2 spell pen feat
+2 greater spell pen feat
+4 epic spell pen feat
And I'm sure I'll have forgotten something. So even if you don't have the past lives or run a different class or ED, there are many options to increase your spell pen. No fail is certainly not 'unattainable' even for a first lifer. You can get spell pen of over 100 if you want.
Yup, this is a clear game design flaw. D&D and the D20 system were never intended for players having a DC difference that big. It only really works if numbers are within 10 points or so (because success chance <50% means it's not worth casting. It just wastes SP and you could have cast something else in that time). And in MMOs number differences do get too big.I just want to add, I'm in the pool of 'First-lifers hitting Legendary and struggling to even reach 80 DCs'. The brick wall I hit is absolutely insane; maybe the saves of monsters in Legendary content made sense when it first came out, compared to the people who'd already been at pre-Legendary cap for a while and had built up their Sentient Weapons, all the best filigree, tomes, etc.
But for players who start the game now, when there's just an unbroken levelling path up to 30s and than *SLAM*, your spells are suddenly doing nothing? It's awful. It genuinely makes me consider dropping the game, because I love spellcasters but my experience with them so far has been *awful*. Heroics are fine, Epics are okay, and then I hit 30 and suddenly I'm useless.
Its DoA for its poor AoE, limited spellbook and lack of symertry with other Rogue trees. Once the newness of AT wears off, few will play it as it offers nothing that cant be done better by preexisting classes and archetypes.I've seen his AT in action. It's very strong. AT has amazing single-target DPS, a smattering of good cc, good defenses and fun powerful mage hand abilities. If it had good aoe on top of this it would be so brokenly OP it's not even funny. The complaints it's 'dead on arrival' are just incorrect.
Lol, okay.Its DoA for its poor AoE, limited spellbook and lack of symertry with other Rogue trees. Once the newness of AT wears off, few will play it as it offers nothing that cant be done better by preexisting classes and archetypes.
Well obviously this person is insensible to reason but further info for anyone reading: I just finished up three past lives for it and, even though the AoE is lacking, it didn't matter because the single-target DPS is so strong you can just tab between enemies and one-shot them in turn almost as quickly. It's survivable and has stolen spell DCs that are effective even for high reaper heroics. I survived an r7 Belly of the Beast. This on top of the full trapping and fun long-range mage hand disable. That's without even getting to cap and really making the most of its DPS, which as I said I've seen in action. 'DoA' is a lunatic claim.Its DoA for its poor AoE, limited spellbook and lack of symertry with other Rogue trees. Once the newness of AT wears off, few will play it as it offers nothing that cant be done better by preexisting classes and archetypes.
Your forgetting that SSG has a tenancy to Nerf the crap out of "new" archetypes a few months after release. Hence I'm already factoring in this fact, and the result it will have on those playing AT.Well obviously this person is insensible to reason but further info for anyone reading: I just finished up three past lives for it and, even though the AoE is lacking, it didn't matter because the single-target DPS is so strong you can just tab between enemies and one-shot them in turn almost as quickly. It's survivable and has stolen spell DCs that are effective even for high reaper heroics. I survived an r7 Belly of the Beast. This on top of the full trapping and fun long-range mage hand disable. That's without even getting to cap and really making the most of its DPS, which as I said I've seen in action. 'DoA' is a lunatic claim.
It's hard to say. SSG surprised a lot of us when they didn't nerf Dragonlord. Who knows if they'll nerf ATr?Your forgetting that SSG has a tenancy to Nerf the crap out of "new" archetypes a few months after release. Hence I'm already factoring in this fact, and the result it will have on those playing AT.
Sub-cap DCs have never been an issue. The DCs in that area are (imho) perfectly tuned. Pushing the proper attribute? Got some +DC gear? Cool, you're set for subcap play.stolen spell DCs that are effective even for high reaper heroics
Casters actually use concentration? Why when you have quicken available?I think a fair skill to base DCs on would be concentration, since every caster uses it. Basing it on spellcraft would give INT-based classes like wizards and alchemists an advantage. Thematically it just fits: greater focus equals more powerful spells.
Casters actually use concentration? Why when you have quicken available?
Casters actually use concentration? Why when you have quicken available?
Do you run high reaper heroics much? I did a life of them recently and hitting the save DCs on r10 on my Wizard was much harder than getting them usable for any content at cap, including Lamordia.Sub-cap DCs have never been an issue. The DCs in that area are (imho) perfectly tuned. Pushing the proper attribute? Got some +DC gear? Cool, you're set for subcap play.
The failure is exclusively at-cap and particularly high reaper at-cap. The difference is so profound, it feels like betrayal to a new player. MMO run-up is supposed to train you for what happens at cap. DDO-Newbie struggles, gets some gear, feels good subcap. Tries that at-cap and it's just "nope", what were you thinking you ignorant peasant?
Well thats an easy answer... New players often start as melees, and having DL being a bit OP at a time when SSG needed to capture a newer demographic makes sense from a monetary PoV. Never mind that DL has had long term consequences for everyone else not playing a physical DPS.It's hard to say. SSG surprised a lot of us when they didn't nerf Dragonlord. Who knows if they'll nerf ATr?
Not just at cap, any legendary quest.The failure is exclusively at-cap and particularly high reaper at-cap. The difference is so profound, it feels like betrayal to a new player. MMO run-up is supposed to train you for what happens at cap. DDO-Newbie struggles, gets some gear, feels good subcap. Tries that at-cap and it's just "nope", what were you thinking you ignorant peasant?