please add "newest first" sort filter to crafting storage...

[Valerianus]

...and also the min level filters, plus renaming the "legacy sort" option into what it is aka oldest first, ending up with the crafting storage having exacly the same useful filters the other storages have.

 

[Ahpuch]

It wold be nice if they added some meta data to the ingredients to indicate what crafting system it is for so that one could include that in the filters. Being able to select all "Sharn Crafting", "Mabar", or "Greensteel -Legendary" would make the crafting storage orders of magnitude less irritating.

If they don't want to do that then at least extend the Tabs to crafting storage so we can bucket them into useful groups ourselves.

 

[dur]

I find it odd you can sort shared bank by 'most recent' but not shared crafting.. 'specially now that I have 24 pages of Crafting items.

 

[dur]

It wold be nice if they added some meta data to the ingredients to indicate what crafting system it is for so that one could include that in the filters. Being able to select all "Sharn Crafting", "Mabar", or "Greensteel -Legendary" would make the crafting storage orders of magnitude less irritating.

If they don't want to do that then at least extend the Tabs to crafting storage so we can bucket them into useful groups ourselves.

That's what I use Large Ingredients bags for

 

[Lazuli]

It wold be nice if they added some meta data to the ingredients to indicate what crafting system it is for so that one could include that in the filters. Being able to select all "Sharn Crafting", "Mabar", or "Greensteel -Legendary" would make the crafting storage orders of magnitude less irritating.

If they don't want to do that then at least extend the Tabs to crafting storage so we can bucket them into useful groups ourselves.

I have been asking for this for ages, but nothing.

 

[tsotate]

I find it odd you can sort shared bank by 'most recent' but not shared crafting.. 'specially now that I have 24 pages of Crafting items.

I had 76 pages last time I was looking for things. If I don't know the name of what I'm searching for, it's gone for good.

 

[dur]

I had 76 pages last time I was looking for things. If I don't know the name of what I'm searching for, it's gone for good.

Yeah, search is definitely weird.. OMG, I hate having to go through 22(ish) Tabs because search (especially in shared crafting bank) is not reliable

 

[Alternative]

I need the option to "sort by type" at least.

 

[gravisrs]

+1 for sorting by date and ML - both ways

Also for regular shared bank please ignore stacking number when sorting by name.

 

[Valerianus]

I had 76 pages last time I was looking for things. If I don't know the name of what I'm searching for, it's gone for good.

exactly this. like e.g. new shiny augments with nice and creative non-standard names? lost in space.

 

[tsotate]

exactly this. like e.g. new shiny augments with nice and creative non-standard names? lost in space.

Right? Could they not at least name them "Ruby of [whatever]", so we could find them without copy-pasting every line from the wiki's page on named augments?

 

[Altra]

Also for regular shared bank please ignore stacking number when sorting by name.

I cannot for the life of me figure out why these are not listed as

Potion of Greater Heroism (27)

It would make sorting so much better.

 

[Ahpuch]

And while we are here...

Allow everything to stack to 1000000. Don't use up 10 slots because I have 943 Magefire Cannon Cores and those items only stack to 100. I can put them in an ingredient bag where they will stack to 2500 so it is possible to change the stacking limit of items. If I empty my green bag of sharn ingredients into my shared bank I will lose about 100 slots to hold the 8 different sharn crafting items.

 

[dur]

Why stop at 1000000, since it's binary, why not 999999?

 

[Ahpuch]

Why stop at 1000000, since it's binary, why not 999999?

In that case go with a "real" binary number of an unsigned int: 4294967295 (0xffffffff) or an signed int: 2147483647 (0x7fffffff).

That first one is the max plat for a reason.

For the record 999999 has nothing to do with binary. The 9->10 is a decimal number feature and not binary where 1->10

 

[dur]

Yeah, well.. I was gonna admit to that* but I figured someone'd speak up

*not knowing binary

**thanks for responding reasonably

 

[Speed]

They could at least just add left arrow on first page that would jump into last page with one click.
If you keep pressing right arrow too fast, then you get "slow down" message.

Current solution is to use bags.

Additionally, numbers in names of some augments like skills (but not only, also blue gems are affected) are displayed incorrectly, so you have to move them into inventory each time to check it.

 

[Ahpuch]

...

Current solution is to use bags.

...

And that is after the much lauded bank fix

 

[dur]

...and also the min level filters, plus renaming the "legacy sort" option into what it is aka oldest first, ending up with the crafting storage having exacly the same useful filters the other storages have.

I would like 'newest first' for all Inv "banks," and ByLevel on PC inventory.

Is it that hard to have all sorting options for all "banks?"

 

[Valerianus]

They could at least just add left arrow on first page that would jump into last page with one click.
If you keep pressing right arrow too fast, then you get "slow down" message.

Current solution is to use bags.

Additionally, numbers in names of some augments like skills (but not only, also blue gems are affected) are displayed incorrectly, so you have to move them into inventory each time to check it.

i agree, that would work too, actually another suggestion i made was about having the jump to first\last page buttons in all banks, auctions.... all ui

https://forums.ddo.com/index.php?threads/please-add-buttons-to-jump-to-first-last-page-in-interfaces.4783/

for the bank will work nicely too, instead of clicking newest first, you click jump to last page