Why is it a tough call when I see it as a no brainier?
Disclaimer that I have no inner knowledge of what goes on at SSG, but some of the things that I could've seen being in the 'for column'
- Site mapping
- Internal Integrations (anything that like customer service may use, or account access, etc..)
- External integrations
- legacy game code integrations (thinking maybe some myddo stuff)
- Public knowledge doesn't need to change (ie. players tend to be known for their long hiatus but may still remember the address/their bookmark wouldn't need to change)
- Documentation
- Communication templates
-
I could probably keep going, but the pattern here is the minimal impact on their systems/existing setup. Far more cost and time effective for deployment.
Scope alone may of been enough to justify it, but for all I know this was largely a solo act for Cordovan with maybe some aid from a contractor/vendor and the MTGO team just to get it up and running. By the url not changing, they could at least cover their end. Then any snafus with linking will eventually phase out over the long term.
Both come with risk and I'm sure there are even more variables at play here. In fact, smart money is on them realizing that as well. 17+ years is a lot to cover and minimizing risk from the forgotten or unknown is a reasonable direction to take.