dunklezhan
Active member
I think we should be able to direct farm for stuff like this, and the upcoming cleansing item. How about putting the cleansing item on a saga list, such as the Morgrave saga list?
Yeah without changes like this I'll be encouraging my static group NOT to use the deck of curses unless they're truly happy with it being a non- or even counter-productive effect. Certainly will be warning them about adding it to named items. Use the decks on on lootgen only, assuming they can be used on lootgen, otherwise avoid unless you are happy risking the potential ruination of your gear or the spending of money in the store.Or instead of a rare chance to appear anywhere, how about adding them as a reasonable drop rate in specific chests?
They could also let you choose from a category of effects rather than the master list so that you can at least say 'I want something that directly affects melee combat' or 'i want something from the caster list'. Sure you can still get threat amplification when you want reduction on your stabby rogue, but at least you'd not going to end up with spellpower or +1 Wisdom.
But whilst the curses can still be deleterious - and they should be, or it's not a deck of curses - and fixing them basically requires the store or the farming of a whole fresh item this is a gambling route for lootgen and easy-farm named items only. Or whales.
I mean let's face it, this is nakedly the gambling loot box your momma warned you about. As such I absolutely do not expect the system to be implemented equitably because that's the opposite of the point of the system. That's not me saying 'SSG are bad evil corporate types bwah ha ha' - just recognising that the reality is this:
- As with all gambling: the odds are stacked in favour of the house
- DO NOT PLAY with the gambling unless you can afford to lose.
Which is the reason I avoid such systems. Silver/Gold rolls are as far as I go, and never, ever ever would I spend Astral Shards on a reroll of those or chest loot, cos those are over my comfort line. This is too.