The Blonde
Catalogues Bugs
Aimed Shot: duplicate +1 Critical Damage Multiplier
That's far too much stuff for a tooltip. I say just have the spellpower window pop out like item descriptions, not a mouseover thing.Could you add the Spell power, Spell Crit and, Spell Crit Multipliers to the tooltip of a spell?
ex.
Horn of Thunder
Cooldown: 12 seconds
Target: Foe, Directional, Breakable
Save: 98 (Fortitude)
Spell Point Cost: 20
School: Evocation
Spell Resistance: No <- Honestly, I think if there's spell resistance involved, it should only show a Spell penetration modifier.
Spell power: 1240 Electric, 1356 Sonic <- List multiple values in alphabetical order. These values should also include any active metamagics
Spell critical: 66% Electric, 69% Sonic
Spell multiplier: 55 Electric, 98 Sonic
I like the Spell pen modifier feedbackCould you add the Spell power, Spell Crit and, Spell Crit Multipliers to the tooltip of a spell?
ex.
Horn of Thunder
Cooldown: 12 seconds
Target: Foe, Directional, Breakable
Save: 98 (Fortitude)
Spell Point Cost: 20
School: Evocation
Spell Resistance: No <- Honestly, I think if there's spell resistance involved, it should only show a Spell penetration modifier.
Spell power: 1240 Electric, 1356 Sonic <- List multiple values in alphabetical order. These values should also include any active metamagics
Spell critical: 66% Electric, 69% Sonic
Spell multiplier: 55 Electric, 98 Sonic
I'd like to know when an attack spell requires no saving throw (like Magic Missile and Power Word Kill). I know that adding a line that says "Saving Throw: None" is the opposite of what you're doing by omitting "Spell Resistance: NO", but I think it would be good to have.
Plot twist, as part of the Epic Destiny Overhaul, the bug has been fixed, making the tooltip accurate!I haven't seen the new tooltip for Primal Avatar's "Weathering the Elements", but the description in the original one is misleading. It says (emphases added):
Weathering the Elements: Gain 15% Absorption against Fire/Cold/Acid/Electric/Poison Damage. Whenever you cast any Protection from Energy spell it grants you 25 points of energy absorption per caster level instead of 12 with no level cap.
It should actually say:
Weathering the Elements: Gain 15% Absorption against Fire/Cold/Acid/Electric/Poison Damage. Whenever anyone casts any Protection from Energy spell on you (including Protection from Elements and Protection from Elements, Mass), it grants you 25 points of energy absorption per caster level instead of 12, with no level cap.
I've tested this.
I agree. What she says is if you could add to the scrolls the spell level to know what inscription component to use in the case of casters with spellbook.Just a thought.
Would it be possible to putUMDrequired on scrolls and wands? Sorry, I meant Spell Level. I was confused (like always)
Thanks
so when will you guys fix ruin bug? lots of players exploiting itPlot twist, as part of the Epic Destiny Overhaul, the bug has been fixed, making the tooltip accurate!
I've been playing DDO for 14 years and I still find it difficult to determine which spell inscription material to use for a given scroll, meaning I have to go the wiki to look it up. I have not memorized it and really shouldn't have to. I would greatly welcome the actual spell level being included in the scroll description (or something saying "Use level x inscription material"). I know the level can vary depending on class in some cases but I believe the scrolls already list multiple levels for no UMD for different classes so it should be possible with the spell/inscription level too.I agree. What she says is if you could add to the scrolls the spell level to know what inscription component to use in the case of casters with spellbook.
Right now you see artificer UMD 12 and you have to know that it is a level 5 spell that requires a level 5 inscription mat. That is very confusing for new ones. Adding the spell level next to the necessary UMD [Example: UMD artificer 12 (spell level 5)] could make it much clearer.
Honestly.I've been playing DDO for 14 years and I still find it difficult to determine which spell inscription material to use for a given scroll