Lazuli
Well-known member
That is not indicative of the class's status as a caster. First, being an archetypal D&D class, many newcomers and casuals try it and that does not mean that it is good in the end game.
Second, being an iconic with DD, it is the easiest class to create as a mule to quickly obtain the kundarak favor (all classes are easy to play in heroic elite, but it helps speed that they have DD and can use teleport without umd )..
Third, there are many people who like the pnp class and are reluctant to let their characters die.
And fourth and not least important, nowadays there are many more EK wizards than pure caster. EK is not a powerful melee in the end game, but an easy build to level up at low difficulty. In fact, the other thread's opener precisely thought that the EK tree was OP because it seemed immensely more powerful than the archmage.
Honestly, Kimbere, your arguments don't hold up. If a class that is too op deserves a nerf, then a class that is left behind should deserve a buff. Although in the case of the wizard, more than a classic buff, what is needed is for the devs to start designing for more caster classes than those that have immunity bypass. Wizard's problem is that he suffers years of neglect in designing options aimed at his platsyle.
Are you so desperate to win the debate that you can't see the frustration of those who actually play wizard casters? I thought more of you than that. Usually I find your arguments reasonable, but here you have closed yourself off in a way that is out of character for you.
Second, being an iconic with DD, it is the easiest class to create as a mule to quickly obtain the kundarak favor (all classes are easy to play in heroic elite, but it helps speed that they have DD and can use teleport without umd )..
Third, there are many people who like the pnp class and are reluctant to let their characters die.
And fourth and not least important, nowadays there are many more EK wizards than pure caster. EK is not a powerful melee in the end game, but an easy build to level up at low difficulty. In fact, the other thread's opener precisely thought that the EK tree was OP because it seemed immensely more powerful than the archmage.
Honestly, Kimbere, your arguments don't hold up. If a class that is too op deserves a nerf, then a class that is left behind should deserve a buff. Although in the case of the wizard, more than a classic buff, what is needed is for the devs to start designing for more caster classes than those that have immunity bypass. Wizard's problem is that he suffers years of neglect in designing options aimed at his platsyle.
Are you so desperate to win the debate that you can't see the frustration of those who actually play wizard casters? I thought more of you than that. Usually I find your arguments reasonable, but here you have closed yourself off in a way that is out of character for you.
Last edited: